Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order as “Unconstitutional”

A federal judge has temporarily blocked former President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to redefine birthright citizenship, deeming it “blatantly unconstitutional.” U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, during the hearing, expressed disbelief at the order’s constitutionality, stating it “boggles the mind.” The restraining order, filed by Arizona, Illinois, Oregon, and Washington, is part of a broader legal challenge involving 22 states and immigrant rights groups.


Trump’s executive order, slated to take effect on February 19, asserts that children born to non-citizens are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction and, therefore, are ineligible for citizenship unless one parent is a U.S. citizen. Critics argue this violates the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the United States. This principle of jus soli, or “right of the soil,” has been upheld for over a century.

The judge heavily questioned the administration's attorneys, calling their arguments for constitutionality unconvincing. Washington Assistant Attorney General Lane Polozola labeled the government’s interpretation as “absurd,” emphasizing the immediate economic and societal impact. States argued that the order would require costly system overhauls and affect hundreds of thousands of children.

A significant example cited in opposition was the 1898 Supreme Court ruling in the Wong Kim Ark case, which stated citizenship for a child born to Chinese immigrants in San Francisco. However, advocates of stricter immigration policies argue that this example applies only to children of legal immigrants.

The lawsuit includes emotional testimonies from attorneys general and immigrants who would be directly impacted. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a birthright citizen, called the order a direct attack on families like his own. One petitioner, a pregnant woman who has lived in the U.S. for 15 years, expressed fears that her child’s future would be risked.

Birthright citizenship is a keystone of American identity and is recognized in about 30 countries, including Canada and Mexico. Advocates warn that altering this fundamental right could have long-term consequences for families and the nation.

For now, the temporary restraining order halts the implementation of the executive order, offering hope to those challenging its constitutionality.

Related International

H5N1 Bird Flu Outbreak: Rising Threat of a New Pandemic in the U.S. and Beyond

A Virus on the Move: From Birds to HumansThe H5N1 avian influenza virus, known as bird flu, has evolved into a serious public health concern in the United States and globally. Once limited to birds, the virus has now spread to over 1,000 dairy cattle herds and caused more than 70 human infections across 13 U.S. states and Canada since March 2024, with one confirmed death.Why Scientists Are AlarmedAccording to the Global Virus Network (GVN) and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), H5N1’s continued transmission among mammals, including domestic pets, raises the risk of mutations that could enable

Read More

Mark Carney Declares Victory: Vows to Defend Canada from Trump’s Threats

Mark Carney, Canada’s newly elected Prime Minister, has declared a defiant victory, pledging that the country will “never” yield to mounting threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. In a powerful victory speech early Tuesday, Carney condemned Trump’s aggressive trade measures and rhetoric, framing the election as a turning point for Canadian sovereignty.Carney’s Liberal Party secured 169 seats in the federal election—just shy of the 172 required for a majority—ushering in a fourth consecutive term, but this time with a minority government. Despite the narrow margin, the win marked a dramatic political comeback fuelled by a surge in anti-Trump sentiment across

Read More

India Suspends Indus Water Treaty: Impact and Strategic Options Explained

Following the April 23, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed 26 lives, India has suspended the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) with Pakistan, demanding that Islamabad permanently cease support for cross-border terrorism. The treaty, signed in 1960, governs the use of the Indus River system and its tributaries, dividing the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) for India and western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) primarily for Pakistan. Former Indus Water Commissioner Pradeep Kumar Saxena stated that India, as the upper riparian country, has many strategic options. These include halting flood data sharing, changing reservoir operations, ignoring past design objections from Pakistan,

Read More